Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
There is a question that almost anyone who has ever sat across from a medium, attended a spiritual workshop, or watched a psychic on television has eventually asked: if these people can genuinely access information beyond the normal range of human perception, why aren’t they all millionaires? And why can’t they simply locate every missing person?
It is a fair question. It is, in fact, one of the sharpest skeptical challenges to the entire field of mediumship and intuitive work. But what if the answer reveals something far more interesting than either believers or skeptics have fully considered? What if the limits of psychic perception are not evidence that it doesn’t work, but rather evidence that it works in a very specific way, for very specific reasons?
Spiritual teacher and former US Navy Commander Suzanne Giesemann has spent decades working at the intersection of rigorous training and genuine intuitive experience. Her explanations for why psychic connection operates within certain hard boundaries offer a coherent, intellectually honest framework that goes well beyond hand-waving or deflection.
The Lottery Problem: Why Spirit Has No Interest in Numbers
When Anne Gehman, a well-known medium whose biography Giesemann wrote, was in a romantic relationship, her then-partner was so impressed by her abilities that he pulled over at a convenience store and bought a stack of lottery tickets, convinced they were about to become very wealthy. They won nothing.
This story gets to the heart of something fundamental about how intuitive information actually moves. The model that most people carry around in their heads imagines a psychic like a radio receiver picking up a clear broadcast signal from some all-knowing cosmic database. Tune in, get the data, win the prize. But this is not how consciousness appears to work when you examine the evidence carefully.
Giesemann describes the process using the metaphor of resonance rather than reception. When a medium connects with information beyond ordinary perception, they are not querying an external database. They are coming into a kind of harmonic resonance with another field of consciousness, another pattern in the ocean of awareness that underlies all of existence. Information flows between coherent, resonant fields the way a tuning fork causes another tuning fork to vibrate at the same frequency. The key word is resonance.
Lottery numbers carry zero emotional charge, zero relational meaning, and zero human story. There is no field of consciousness attached to the numbers 7, 14, 23, 38, 41, and 12. There is no grief in them, no love, no shared memory, no personality, no living or departed human experience woven through them. They are purely mechanical numerical data, and purely mechanical numerical data does not appear to have a coherent field that a human nervous system can resonate with.
This is not a loophole or an excuse. It is a direct consequence of what mediumship and intuitive work actually are.
The Compression Problem: How Information Gets Lost in Translation
Even when a medium is connecting with something that does carry genuine resonance, a beloved person who has passed, or a living person in distress, the information that comes through is heavily compressed and symbolic. This is one of the most important and under-discussed aspects of intuitive work.
Giesemann uses the example of an address. Imagine a departed spirit whose name was John Smith and who lived at 1925 Oak Street. A medium tuning into that person is unlikely to receive the full address as a clear spoken sentence. What they are more likely to receive is a fragment of a name beginning with J or S, a loose number like five, and an image of an oak leaf. A listener with knowledge of that person might instantly connect the oak leaf to Oak Street. Without that contextual resonance, the image floats without meaning.
This compression happens because the information is not traveling as language or data. It is traveling as sensation, imagery, feeling, and knowing. The human nervous system, for all its extraordinary complexity, is not built to handle the direct transmission of specific practical data like GPS coordinates or lottery sequences. What it can handle are impressions, symbols, emotional tones, and relational memories.
This is why the most accurate readings involve things that only the sitter could recognize. A specific nickname, a shared joke, a private memory, the color of a favorite cardigan, the name of a childhood pet. These things carry dense relational charge, and that charge is what creates the resonance that allows information to travel.
The Coherence Problem: Why Trauma Blocks Transmission
The most heartbreaking limitation of mediumship involves missing persons cases, particularly those involving trauma, abduction, or violent crime. The very situations where people most desperately need psychic assistance are often the ones where psychic assistance is hardest to deliver.
The reason comes down to coherence. For any form of intuitive connection to work, both the medium and the person being connected with need to be in a relatively stable, coherent state. Coherence here does not mean perfect calm. It means a certain degree of integrated, functional awareness.
A person who has been kidnapped, injured, or murdered is unlikely to be in a coherent state. They may be in extreme shock, severe pain, profound disorientation, or a post-traumatic fugue. If they are deceased, the transition itself may involve a period of disorientation before awareness restabilizes. This absence of coherence in the target consciousness means there is no stable field for the medium to resonate with. What the medium senses instead is noise, blankness, or diffuse distress signals that cannot be organized into useful directional information.
Giesemann points to a deeply troubling historical example to illustrate the danger of misinterpreting this blankness. A prominent television psychic once told the mother of a missing girl on a popular talk show that her daughter was dead. That mother grieved for years and died before learning the truth. Her daughter had been kidnapped and was very much alive, watching the show from where she was being held captive. The psychic had sensed silence and interpreted it as death, when in fact it was the incoherence of a traumatized, terrified young woman.
The ethical weight of this cannot be overstated. Silence in a psychic reading is not the same as death. It may simply mean that the person being sought is not in a state where coherent connection is possible.
What Remote Viewing Gets Right and Where It Still Struggles
Remote viewing, the structured practice of perceiving locations, objects, or events beyond ordinary sensory range, has been studied seriously enough that the US military funded research programs around it for decades. Practitioners describe a discipline that requires entering specific altered states of consciousness in order to receive impressions of a target location or object.
What remote viewing research consistently shows is exactly what Giesemann describes from the intuitive side. The information that comes through tends to be gestural, spatial, and sensory rather than precise and linguistic. A remote viewer might accurately perceive that a target location involves water, a curved structure, a feeling of great age, and the color red. They are far less likely to accurately report the full name and street address of the location.
The method works, within specific parameters, for exactly the reasons Giesemann outlines. Human consciousness can resonate with the broad shape of physical and experiential reality. It struggles enormously to extract the kind of precise, decontextualized data points that would make it practically useful for solving crimes or predicting financial outcomes.
What Mediumship Is Actually Built For
Understanding what psychic and mediumistic connection cannot do makes it far easier to appreciate what it genuinely appears to do. The consistent throughline across documented cases is relational and emotional rather than informational and practical.
In one of the most compelling missing persons cases Giesemann has worked on, she was asked to help locate a young man lost after a devastating mudslide. She was honest about her limitations from the start. She could not guarantee she would find him. What she could do was describe the personality of his father and brother with enough specificity that the bereaved mother recognized them immediately. She could relay the message that they were together, that they were at peace, and that the boy’s remains would eventually be found.
When the search narrowed to a specific area and his mother called Giesemann from the field, Giesemann tuned in and received a series of symbolic impressions. A dead crow. An X shape. The letter K near the sound of rushing water. None of these constituted a precise location. All of them served as resonant markers that helped the searchers focus their attention. Bone fragments were eventually found and confirmed through DNA analysis.
The value delivered was not a GPS coordinate. The value delivered was the beginning of closure, the sense of an ongoing connection between a mother and her son, and the personal message that he was at peace and that she would find him. For the family, this had incalculable worth.
The Deeper Design Behind the Limits
There is a perspective, one that Giesemann articulates carefully, suggesting that the limits of psychic perception may not be bugs in the system but features of it. If consciousness could reliably deliver specific practical information on demand, the entire structure of human experience would shift. We would stop developing discernment, resilience, or trust. We would stop walking through the uncertainty that appears to be one of the primary teachers in human life.
The medium is not a broken search engine. The medium is, at their best, a translator of something that travels in the currency of love, memory, relationship, and meaning. Numbers do not carry meaning in that sense. They are not the language of whatever it is that moves through these connections.
This does not require anyone to abandon skepticism. But it does suggest that the failure of psychics to win lotteries or instantly solve every missing person’s case is not the knock-down argument it appears to be. The real question is not why psychic perception cannot do what a computer can do. The real question is what it can do that nothing else can, and why that might matter.
The answer, it seems, always comes back to the same word: connection.
Looking for more on consciousness, intuitive experience, and the science of spiritual connection? Explore our related articles on near-death experiences, plant medicine and expanded awareness, and the Law of One framework.
PIN It:
