Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The question of suffering is perhaps one of the most enduring and challenging mysteries of human existence. Why do we experience pain, loss, and hardship in a world that also holds such immense beauty and joy? For millennia, philosophers, theologians, and everyday people have grappled with this profound inquiry, often arriving at vastly different conclusions. Some attribute suffering to divine will, seeing it as a test or punishment. Others view it as an inherent, unavoidable part of the human condition, a random byproduct of a chaotic universe.
Yet, a different perspective emerges from a unique spiritual dialogue, one that suggests suffering is not a mandate from the divine, but rather a creation of our own making. This view posits that the hurt we experience, both individually and collectively, stems from a complex interplay of the fundamental nature of reality, the power of human consciousness, and the choices we make. It is a viewpoint that challenges conventional understanding and invites us to look inward for the answers.
This perspective suggests that the divine is not a distant, judgmental entity that orchestrates pain for some cosmic purpose. In fact, it is asserted that the divine takes no pleasure in suffering whatsoever. The idea that suffering is willed by the divine is presented as a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of the ultimate reality. Far from being a desired or necessary component of our journey, suffering is described as an unnecessary aspect of the human experience, something unwise, uncomfortable, and even detrimental to our well-being.
So, if suffering isn’t a divine decree, where does it come from? The insights from this spiritual dialogue point emphatically towards human consciousness and our reaction to the events of life.
The Power of Reaction: How We Create Our Own Pain
One of the most striking claims is that suffering has very little to do with the events themselves, and everything to do with how we react to them. Life unfolds as a series of happenings, but the emotional and psychological pain we associate with these happenings is not an intrinsic part of them. It is our feeling about what happens that determines whether we suffer.
This internal creation of suffering is said to arise from “wrong thought.” What constitutes “wrong thought” in this context? It is specifically identified as thinking that you do not want to experience something you are, in fact, experiencing. This resistance to what is, this internal pushback against the reality of the present moment, is a primary engine of suffering.
The Burden of Judgment
A significant contributor to this “wrong thought” and subsequent suffering is judgment. When we attach a judgment to an experience – labeling it as “bad,” “wrong,” or “unwanted” – we imbue it with the power to cause us pain. The perspective suggests that removing the judgment has the power to dissolve the pain associated with it. Our judgments, along with our expectations about how things should be, are seen as major obstacles to joy, leading to unhappiness, and ultimately, contributing to suffering and even illness. Resisting what is happening, judging it as undesirable, locks us into a state of internal conflict that manifests as pain.
The Relative Realm: The Necessity of Opposites
Another layer to understanding suffering from this perspective lies in the fundamental nature of the reality we inhabit. Life in the physical realm is characterized by duality. It is a realm of opposites: light and dark, hot and cold, up and down, joy and sorrow. This duality is not an accident, but a necessary condition for experience and understanding.
Imagine trying to understand “light” if there were no such thing as “darkness.” The concept would be meaningless. Similarly, experiencing “joy” requires the contrast of “sorrow” or suffering. Creating the realm of the relative, this dialogue explains, necessitated the creation of the opposite of the divine itself, which is pure love. This opposite is fear.
Within this framework of duality, suffering emerges as the opposite of joy or well-being. Its existence provides the essential contrast that allows the soul, our deeper spiritual essence, to truly know and experience “That Which You Are.” By experiencing “That Which You Are Not” – by experiencing the opposite of our true, joyful, loving nature – we gain a profound understanding and appreciation for what we authentically are. Suffering, in this sense, serves a purpose within the larger cosmic design of self-discovery, providing the backdrop against which the brilliance of our true nature can be perceived.
The Weight of Collective Consciousness
While individual reactions and the nature of reality play significant roles, suffering on a larger scale – the worldwide calamities, illnesses, and societal woes – is attributed to the power of collective consciousness. This perspective asserts that these large-scale manifestations of suffering are not directly willed or caused by the divine, but are made manifest in our reality at humanity’s collective behest.
Worldwide calamities are seen as the result of “worldwide consciousness” or “mass consciousness.” The events that unfold on the global stage are a reflection of the “Collective Consciousness” of humanity. This collective consciousness is described as being at a relatively “primitive” level, characterized by pervasive fear, anger, a sense of lack, and a belief in insufficiency. These underlying states of being, held collectively by humanity, create the experiences of suffering that we witness globally.
A crucial element perpetuating this collective suffering is the concept of Separation. When we perceive ourselves as separate from others, we become less able to experience the suffering of another as if it were our own. This inability to empathize fully, to recognize the interconnectedness of all beings, allows suffering to continue unchecked on a massive scale. The walls of separation built by our collective consciousness prevent the flow of compassion and understanding that could alleviate so much pain.
Human Choices and Societal Structures: The Tangible Roots of Suffering
Beyond the realms of consciousness and the nature of reality, this perspective also squarely places responsibility for much suffering on the concrete choices humans make and the structures societies build. The state of the world and the individual lives within it are seen as direct consequences of the choices humanity has made, or in many cases, failed to make.
Consider the issue of hunger. This dialogue suggests that global hunger is not an insurmountable problem but one that could be ended if humanity collectively chose to prioritize its eradication. The fact that it persists is a reflection of our collective choices and priorities.
Actions such as ignoring the weak and downtrodden, engaging in deception and manipulation, and even societal issues like sexual repression are cited as contributors to the world’s state of suffering. Furthermore, the very structures of our societies, often prioritizing economic interests and material gain over humanitarian concerns and the well-being of the soul, perpetuate suffering. The inherent struggle between the “haves” and the “have-nots,” where the exploitation of the less advantaged is sometimes seen as necessary for certain lifestyles to be maintained, is a direct result of these societal priorities and choices.
Suffering is Not Punishment
A point strongly emphasized in this spiritual dialogue is that suffering, either in this life or any potential afterlife, is never a punishment from the divine. The idea of a punitive deity who inflicts suffering as retribution is rejected as a human construct, often perpetuated by religious doctrines.
It is suggested that some religions have created theologies centered around punishment and concepts like “original sin” to justify the need for salvation and to paint a picture of a God who judges and punishes. However, this perspective asserts that the divine is perfect and creates only perfection. Suffering is not a tool of divine discipline but a consequence of human misunderstanding, reaction, and choice within the framework of a relative reality designed for the soul’s experience.
A Higher Purpose? Seeing Perfection in Everything
Perhaps the most challenging aspect of this perspective is the suggestion that even what humans label as “evil” and tragedy can be viewed differently from a higher vantage point. Events like war and natural disasters, universally seen as calamities, and actions considered heinous, like those of historical figures associated with immense suffering, are acknowledged for their devastating human impact.
However, the dialogue encourages a shift in perspective, inviting us to see the perfection in everything, even in the midst of tragedy. This does not mean condoning or minimizing the pain caused, but rather understanding that all events and experiences, no matter how difficult, serve a larger purpose in the soul’s journey: the purpose of “creating of opportunity.”
Every experience, including suffering, provides the soul with the opportunity to decide and be who it is. Even what humanity calls “evil” serves a function, as it provides the necessary contrast for us to define ourselves as “good.” Without the experience of what we deem undesirable, we would have no context for choosing and expressing what we desire. The divine love and purpose are described as being vast enough to encompass even the most difficult circumstances and the individuals involved in them. From this elevated view, everything, in its own way, contributes to the unfolding story of the soul’s evolution and self-awareness.
The Unnecessary Hurt: A Summary
In summary, the insights from this spiritual dialogue offer a powerful reframe on the age-old question of suffering. It is not presented as a curse from the divine or an inescapable fate, but rather as an “unnecessary aspect” of the human experience, largely created by humanity itself.
Suffering exists on Earth primarily because of the fundamental nature of reality in the relative realm, which requires opposites for experience and understanding. However, the acute pain of suffering is primarily a result of human reaction to events – our judgments, our resistance to what is, and our “wrong thoughts” about our experiences.
Furthermore, suffering on a global scale is a manifestation of our collective consciousness, steeped in fear, separation, and limiting beliefs. The tangible choices we make as individuals and societies, prioritizing certain interests over compassion and unity, also contribute significantly to the perpetuation of pain.
Crucially, suffering is not viewed as a punishment from the divine. Instead, it is seen as a human creation and, from a higher perspective, a tool for the soul’s experience, growth, and evolution. By understanding these dynamics, this perspective suggests, humanity holds the key to alleviating much of the suffering it currently experiences – by changing its consciousness, its reactions, its choices, and its collective understanding of reality. The path away from unnecessary hurt lies not in seeking divine intervention to remove it, but in transforming ourselves from within.
