Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

There is an old parable about two young fish who pass an elder in the water. The elder nods and asks, "How's the water?" The two swim on for a while before one turns to the other and asks, "What the hell is water?" It is a story about the conditions we swim in so constantly that we stop being able to see them at all.
There is an old parable about two young fish who pass an elder in the water. The elder nods and asks, “How’s the water?” The two swim on for a while before one turns to the other and asks, “What the hell is water?” It is a story about the conditions we swim in so constantly that we stop being able to see them at all.
Physician and trauma researcher Dr. Gabor Maté uses that same image in his book The Myth of Normal to describe the culture most of us are raised inside: a culture so saturated with stress, disconnection, and the quiet denial of what human beings actually need that we have come to accept those conditions as simply how life is. He calls this malignant normality, and at the center of it he places trauma, understood not as the event itself but as the injury that remains lodged in the body and nervous system long after the event has passed.
Maté’s focus is this lifetime. But if trauma is truly a wound that outlives its origin, a natural question follows. Could that origin, in some cases, sit further back than childhood? Could some of what we carry have entered the body before this incarnation began?
Conventional trauma work looks to childhood first, and rightly so. Maté distinguishes between the small “t” traumas of chronic emotional neglect or being consistently unseen, and the big “T” traumas of abuse, violence, or loss. Both leave what he describes as a constriction of the self, a narrowing that keeps a person from fully inhabiting the present moment.
[Also See: Most Of Your Trauma Could Come From a Previous Life]
Yet therapists and parents alike keep running into something these categories don’t fully explain: a child terrified of drowning who has never been near deep water, an adult gripped by dread in situations that carry no personal history of danger, a fear so specific and so old feeling that it seems to arrive from somewhere else entirely. When a wound has no biographical anchor in this life, the question of where it actually originated becomes harder to dismiss.
For more than fifty years, researchers at the University of Virginia’s Division of Perceptual Studies have documented children, usually between the ages of two and five, who spontaneously describe details of a life that was not their own. The division was founded by Dr. Ian Stevenson and is now directed by Dr. Jim Tucker, who has continued building a database that now holds more than two thousand cases.
These are not vague impressions. Investigators record names, locations, causes of death, and family relationships that a young child would have had no ordinary way of knowing, then attempt to verify those details against a real, deceased individual. Researchers at the division have described roughly a third of their strongest cases as involving a birthmark or birth defect that lines up with a wound or cause of death reported by the child, a striking correlation that has no easy conventional explanation. Current researchers at the division, including Marieta Pehlivanova and Philip Cozzolino, have said that around seventy percent of the cases they take on end up matching to a real person from the past once fully investigated.
What stands out in this research is not only that children report these memories, but that the memories often arrive bundled with emotion: a phobia, a grief, a bodily sensation that behaves exactly like trauma behaves in someone who lived through the event themselves.
Maté insists throughout his work that human beings are biopsychosocial, meaning biology, emotion, and social experience are never truly separate. He points to epigenetics, the way environment can switch gene expression on or off without altering the underlying DNA, as one mechanism by which lived experience becomes physically embedded rather than staying purely psychological.
If unresolved emotional experience can shape the body this deeply within a single lifetime, it is not a large leap for those working in energy healing and past life therapy to propose that something similar could carry across incarnations, an imprint held less like a memory and more like a residue in the body’s felt sense. Practitioners in this space often describe a heaviness in the chest, a persistent tightness through the throat and spine, or a sensation clients call a lump or a weight, present even when nothing shows up on a scan. Maté’s own language for chronic illness, that it often reflects an entire life lived rather than a single injury, extends naturally to a life understood as spanning more than one body.
One of the central arguments in The Myth of Normal is that every child faces a quiet, ongoing negotiation between two needs that should never have to compete: attachment, the need to stay close to caregivers, and authenticity, the need to stay true to one’s own inner experience. When a child’s environment makes authenticity unsafe, the child will consistently choose attachment and bury the authentic self to preserve it. Maté calls this the fracture at the root of most adult suffering.
Some practitioners working with past life material extend this same tension backward. If a soul enters this life already carrying an assaulted sense of self from a previous death by violence, betrayal, or oppression, the negotiation between attachment and authenticity may begin distorted before the first breath is even drawn. A baby who seems unusually anxious, withdrawn, or resistant to bonding from the very start, with nothing in the current pregnancy or birth to explain it, is sometimes read by these practitioners as a soul already bracing for a threat that belongs to an earlier story.
A handful of patterns tend to recur in people who suspect their struggles reach further back than this life:
None of these signs prove a past life on their own. But taken together, and especially when they cluster around a specific theme, they are often what leads someone toward this kind of work in the first place.
Maté describes healing as a natural movement toward wholeness rather than a cure, closer to a process of self-retrieval than repair. Several modalities aim at exactly that kind of retrieval when the material in question may be older than this body.
Somatic work. Because unresolved experience lives in the body rather than only in the story we tell about it, techniques that work through sensation rather than narrative can shift a person out of a fight, flight, or freeze pattern without requiring them to relive anything in detail. A common approach is to imagine an emotion or belief as an object lowered slowly through the body, pausing wherever tension gathers to breathe and let it soften.
Hypnotherapy and past life regression. A state of deep relaxation can make material that sits below ordinary awareness easier to access. Whether a regression experience is taken as a literal memory or as a powerful metaphor generated by the subconscious, working with it directly often loosens the emotional charge attached to it.
Akashic Records work. Practitioners describe the Akashic Records as an energetic record of the soul’s full journey, accessible through a trained reader or through one’s own meditative practice. Sessions typically aim to locate where a pattern first took hold, whether in this life, a past life, or an inherited ancestral line, and to consciously release the charge once its origin is understood, a process some practitioners describe as closing the loop rather than reliving it.
Compassionate inquiry. Maté’s own method centers on gentle, curious questions rather than analysis: where did this belief come from, who taught you that you were not safe to be yourself. When the honest answer does not exist anywhere in this lifetime, the same questions can be turned toward whatever lies beyond it.
Maté frames healing as a kind of waking up, to the wound and to the gift sitting alongside it, to what the body has been expressing all along while the mind worked to suppress it. Extend that same waking up across the boundary of a single lifetime and something similar happens. The personality stops looking like a fixed identity and starts looking like an adaptation, a mix of genuine traits and protective strategies built to survive circumstances that, in some cases, may have ended centuries ago.
Whatever the true origin of a given wound turns out to be, whether it formed in this childhood or in a life that ended long before this one began, the discovery that the pain has a coherent story tends to land the same way: as relief. It hands a person back a measure of agency, the ability to meet an old fear with curiosity instead of confusion, and to choose, deliberately, how much of the past they are willing to keep carrying forward.
We are, in the end, still those two fish. Most of the time we simply keep swimming. Every so often, though, something makes us stop long enough to finally ask what the water actually is.